The Public Prosecutor’s Workplace indicts the membership for corruption within the ‘Negrera case’

Bartomeu’s supervisor, straight accused

The difficulty of funds from FC Barcelona to an organization headed by the then Vice-President of the Referees Technical Committee, José María Enriquez Negrera, The Public Prosecutor denounced what he described as a corruption caseIn response to data revealed by the newspaper “El Pais”. Fees might be introduced towards each the membership and former president Josep Maria Bartomeu.

Each are charged with the crime of enterprise corruption enshrined within the authorized system in place since 2010, which incorporates fraud in sports activities. As a result of it’s a piece in progress, The criticism is prone to result in a sequence of aggravating circumstances within the judgments. In response to the newspaper, which consulted judicial sources, this determination would be the results of a year-long investigation.

Prosecutor’s criticism

Some members of the board of administrators headed by Bartomeu may also be concerned within the criticism, in addition to Enriquez Negrera himself, whose firm obtained about seven million euros from the Catalan entity for oral recommendationa difficulty that’s nonetheless being decided within the still-developing analysis course of.

In response to the aforementioned felony reform, Any authorized individual can bear felony legal responsibility if a criminal offense is dedicatedBoth personally or on behalf of the corporate or by way of its administration or authorized illustration. The investigation course of began in mid-2022 for wrongdoing by Enríquez Negreira’s group, Dasnil 95 SL.

The “Negreira case” will go to different instances

Likewise, the newspaper indicated that This criticism filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Workplace will now be transferred to the Barcelona Courtroom As soon as all proof is collected by the Nationwide Police Power. As within the case of ongoing corruption between 2001 and 2018, though solely occasions from 2010 might be taken into consideration, as reform has not occurred earlier than and has no retroactive impact.